360Learning Pricing 2026: Team, Business & Active-User Costs

360Learning pricing has a clear small-team entry point and a sales-led enterprise path. Team costs $8 per active user per month with monthly pay-as-you-go billing and a 30-day trial. 360Learning's official U.S. learning-software page says Business starts at $10,000 annually for larger organizations needing implementation, success teams and custom integrations.

Team Plan: $8 per active user/month

The Team Plan costs $8 per active user per month and is fully self-service.

360Learning positions it for organizations training fewer than one hundred users.

Learners, authors and administrators all use the same active-user billing rate.

This makes Team simple to budget when monthly user activity is well understood.

Monthly pay-as-you-go billing

Team billing works in monthly cycles rather than an annual prepaid commitment.

Each invoice reflects users who had active accounts during the previous billing cycle.

The model can be efficient for rotating learner populations because inactive or removed users do not need to stay billable forever.

Teams should align onboarding and offboarding with the billing-cycle date.

What counts as active

An invited user is not charged until the user activates the account through the invitation process.

A user explicitly set up by an administrator can become active and billable immediately.

Users who had an account for even a short period during a cycle can be included in that cycle's invoice.

This definition matters because 'active user' does not simply mean someone who completed a course that month.

Minimum monthly cost

360Learning's support documentation says the platform administrator is an active user.

That means the practical minimum Team invoice is $8 for a month in which only the owner/admin is active.

Adding ten active learners would create an $80 learner cost for that cycle, plus any other active accounts.

This direct arithmetic makes Team easier to forecast than many tiered LMS plans.

30-day trial

Team includes a thirty-day self-service free trial.

No sales call is required to start the Team trial from the current landing page.

This is a useful period for testing authoring, collaboration, learner feedback and administration before paying.

Enterprise integrations or Business-only capabilities should be evaluated separately with sales.

Business Plan: from $10,000/year

360Learning's current U.S. learning-software page states that Business starts at $10,000 annually.

Business targets larger organizations that need dedicated implementation, success teams and custom integrations.

The public page provides a starting point rather than a universal fixed price.

Final Business pricing can vary with organization size, integrations, services and selected solutions.

Enterprise and larger deployments

360Learning's main pricing page is demo-led for mid-size and large organizations and emphasizes tailored professional services.

Large deployments can span internal and external audiences from a single platform and may use mixed commercial models.

Dedicated solution architects and strategic consultants can support data migration and complex integrations.

Buyers should request an itemized quote rather than assuming the $10,000 Business starting point covers enterprise scope.

Cancellation for Team

Team can be canceled at any time from the Billing area.

Current support documentation says a canceled Team customer is not billed for the final cycle and retains access until that cycle ends.

This is more flexible than an annual nonrefundable commitment.

Administrators should export needed data before account deletion after cancellation.

Business cancellation

Business customers do not use the self-service Team cancellation flow.

Current support guidance directs Business customers to their Client Success Partner for cancellation or subscription management.

This means notice periods, refunds and termination rights should be treated as contract-specific.

Procurement should confirm those terms before signing.

Refund expectations

Public Team documentation explains the no-final-cycle-bill cancellation behavior but does not advertise a general money-back guarantee.

Business refund rights are governed by commercial agreement rather than a public universal policy.

Do not assume a trial or cancellation option creates broad refund rights.

The 30-day Team trial is the best way to reduce product-fit risk before subscribing.

Content-library costs

360Learning connects with external libraries such as Coursera, Go1, LinkedIn Learning, OpenSesame, Skillsoft and Udemy Business.

Some content providers require Curated Programs or separate external licensing.

Those costs should be budgeted separately from the base Team price or Business quote.

Content-heavy organizations can spend more on libraries than on the LMS itself.

Integration costs

360Learning supports HRIS, CRM, collaboration and content integrations, but advanced enterprise connectivity can be package-dependent.

Business specifically positions custom integrations as part of the larger-enterprise offer.

External systems such as Workday, SAP, Salesforce or Microsoft Teams have their own licensing costs.

Ask which connectors are included, separately priced or require professional services.

Professional Services

360Learning's pricing page says Professional Services are tailored to specific goals rather than charged as one flat universal implementation fee.

Dedicated solution architects and strategic consultants can handle complex integrations, migrations and collaborative-learning design.

That can improve launch quality but adds to total contract value.

Organizations with simple under-100-user needs should avoid paying enterprise implementation costs when Team is sufficient.

Skills and solution modules

Skills capabilities, Curated Programs and other solutions can extend the platform beyond the core Team use case.

Some are separate solutions or commercial add-ons.

These modules can be valuable for larger L&D transformations but complicate price comparisons with basic LMS products.

Request line-item pricing for every solution included in the business case.

Team versus Business

Team is best when user count remains below one hundred and the organization can implement largely on its own.

Business becomes more relevant when scale, integrations, implementation and ongoing success support matter.

The jump from a flexible monthly rate to a $10,000+ annual starting point is meaningful.

Organizations near one hundred users should compare projected annual Team activity against the Business quote before choosing.

360Learning versus TalentLMS

TalentLMS has a permanent free plan and paid tiers beginning at $119 per month billed yearly.

That can be more predictable for fixed user brackets and very small experiments.

360Learning Team is more flexible for active-user billing and places greater emphasis on collaborative authoring.

Choose based on content-creation model as well as price.

360Learning versus Docebo

Docebo uses fully custom Elevate and Enterprise pricing with MAU, YAU or RAU models.

360Learning provides a transparent Team entry point and a published $10,000 Business starting point.

Docebo offers broader enterprise module depth, while 360Learning differentiates around collaborative learning and faster expert-driven authoring.

Larger buyers should compare full quotes and implementation scope.

360Learning versus Moodle

Self-hosted Moodle has no software license fee, while MoodleCloud publishes annual managed-hosting plans.

Moodle can therefore appear cheaper but requires more operational responsibility or partner services.

360Learning is a managed SaaS product with a more opinionated collaborative-learning workflow.

Total cost should include administration and support, not just subscription fees.

360Learning versus LearnUpon

LearnUpon uses custom pricing and starts its employee-learning package from one hundred users.

It includes implementation consulting, customer success and 24/7 support across its plans.

360Learning Team is better suited to organizations below one hundred users that want transparent monthly active-user pricing.

At larger scale, compare the two based on service model, collaboration and integrations.

Pricing recommendation

Choose Team when the under-100-user, self-service, active-user model fits and use the 30-day trial before paying.

Choose Business when dedicated implementation, custom integrations and ongoing success support justify the higher annual commitment.

Track user activation and deletion dates carefully because Team billing is sensitive to account status during the cycle.

Request an itemized quote for any content, skills, integration or professional-service add-ons.

Pricing analysis: Active-user forecasting

The Team Plan charges for users who are active during the monthly billing cycle, so the most important pricing input is not total headcount but how many people will have an active account during each month. Seasonal onboarding, customer academies and compliance campaigns can create meaningful peaks.

Model several months of expected activity instead of multiplying total employees by $8. The active-user model can be efficient when learner populations rotate, but poor user-lifecycle management can inflate invoices.

Pricing analysis: User lifecycle

Invited users are not billable until they activate their account, while users explicitly set up by an administrator can become billable immediately. Deleted or suspended users can reduce future billing, subject to the timing rules of the monthly cycle.

Organizations using Team should define a repeatable process for onboarding, deactivation and reactivation so inactive users do not remain unnecessarily billable.

Pricing analysis: Collaborative authoring governance

360Learning is designed to decentralize course creation to subject-matter experts. That can shorten production cycles, but it also requires ownership rules for review, expiry, versioning, brand consistency and subject-matter accuracy.

A collaborative model works best when expert creation is paired with clear approval workflows rather than allowing every course to remain permanently ownerless.

Pricing analysis: AI governance

AI-assisted authoring can accelerate outlines, drafts, quizzes and course development, but organizations still need human review for accuracy, legal language, accessibility and internal policy alignment.

Document who can create AI-generated content, what source material may be uploaded and how content is approved before publication.

Pricing analysis: Integration planning

360Learning connects with HR, productivity, CRM and content systems. The business value comes from removing repeated manual work, especially user provisioning, assignment, content discovery and completion-data synchronization.

Test the exact production workflow with real identity and HR data before assuming a connector will eliminate administrative effort.

Pricing analysis: Content ecosystem

External libraries such as Coursera, LinkedIn Learning, Go1, OpenSesame, Skillsoft and Udemy Business can extend the catalog, but those services may require separate commercial agreements or specific 360Learning packages.

Separate platform subscription cost from content licensing so the learning budget remains understandable.

Pricing analysis: Reporting requirements

Decide which decisions reporting must support before configuring dashboards. Typical requirements include compliance completion, academy engagement, skill development, content effectiveness and manager visibility.

If advanced reporting or tailored statistics are important, validate those workflows directly because public reviews occasionally cite gaps or paid-solution dependencies.

Pricing analysis: Security review

360Learning publishes ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II compliance, GDPR alignment and Microsoft Azure hosting. Formal buyers should still verify the exact current certificates, regional hosting or residency needs, subprocessor list and contractual security requirements.

Security review should include integrations because connected HR and identity systems expand the effective data boundary.

Pricing analysis: Implementation model

Team is designed for self-service implementation, while larger Business deployments add implementation, success services and custom integrations. Buyers should compare internal implementation capacity with the value of professional services.

A lower software rate can become expensive if the organization lacks the resources needed to structure groups, data, integrations and governance well.

Pricing analysis: Decision framework

Compare 360Learning and alternatives on authoring model, administration, integration depth, analytics, security, support and three-year total cost.

The product is most differentiated when collaborative creation changes how L&D operates, not when it is used merely as a repository for centrally produced courses.

Pricing analysis: Active-user forecasting

The Team Plan charges for users who are active during the monthly billing cycle, so the most important pricing input is not total headcount but how many people will have an active account during each month. Seasonal onboarding, customer academies and compliance campaigns can create meaningful peaks.

Model several months of expected activity instead of multiplying total employees by $8. The active-user model can be efficient when learner populations rotate, but poor user-lifecycle management can inflate invoices.

Pricing analysis: User lifecycle

Invited users are not billable until they activate their account, while users explicitly set up by an administrator can become billable immediately. Deleted or suspended users can reduce future billing, subject to the timing rules of the monthly cycle.

Organizations using Team should define a repeatable process for onboarding, deactivation and reactivation so inactive users do not remain unnecessarily billable.

Pricing analysis: Collaborative authoring governance

360Learning is designed to decentralize course creation to subject-matter experts. That can shorten production cycles, but it also requires ownership rules for review, expiry, versioning, brand consistency and subject-matter accuracy.

A collaborative model works best when expert creation is paired with clear approval workflows rather than allowing every course to remain permanently ownerless.

Pricing analysis: AI governance

AI-assisted authoring can accelerate outlines, drafts, quizzes and course development, but organizations still need human review for accuracy, legal language, accessibility and internal policy alignment.

Document who can create AI-generated content, what source material may be uploaded and how content is approved before publication.

Pricing analysis: Integration planning

360Learning connects with HR, productivity, CRM and content systems. The business value comes from removing repeated manual work, especially user provisioning, assignment, content discovery and completion-data synchronization.

Test the exact production workflow with real identity and HR data before assuming a connector will eliminate administrative effort.

Continue reading about 360Learning

• 360Learning tool profile
• 360Learning Review: Features, Pricing, Pros and Cons
• 360Learning Alternatives 2026: 4 LMS Options by Use Case