InVideo Pricing: Starter, Plus, Max and AI Credit Costs

InVideo currently advertises a limited Free plan and three public paid tiers—Starter, Plus and Max—plus business-level sales arrangements. Its displayed 50% annual offer puts Starter at $10 per editor seat per month equivalent, Plus at $30 and Max at $75, billed up front for a year. The corresponding displayed monthly-billing rates are $20, $60 and $150 per seat. Those figures are in USD, before any checkout-specific taxes or optional purchases, and were checked against the official pricing page on October 28, 2026. The real cost of InVideo is not just the subscription: AI agents and generation consume a variable credit budget.

See the InVideo Tool profile for its current overview and related information.

InVideo pricing table

These prices were displayed on the official InVideo pricing page in USD at the research date. The provider presents a 50% annual discount; it should not be treated as a permanent standard price or as a promise that an account in every region will see the same checkout. The monthly equivalent of a yearly commitment is a comparison metric, not a pay-as-you-go bill. For example, $10 per month equivalent multiplied by twelve equals $120 paid for one annual Starter seat under the advertised offer.

The plan matrix also shows a route to enterprise arrangements, but no reliable public enterprise subscription amount. Enterprise customers should request a written seat count, generation allowance, data handling terms, support level and service arrangement. A sales conversation is necessary for a meaningful total cost. Do not assume that the consumer Max subscription automatically includes enterprise single sign-on, legal indemnification or every compliance document marketed elsewhere on the site.

What you buy with each tier

Free: interface and low-volume exploration

InVideo's current Terms of Service state that a limited Free Plan is available. A vendor help article says users can begin without entering a payment card and receive a small AI-credit quota that resets weekly at Monday 00:00 UTC. This can help someone decide whether they understand the workflow, can write useful prompts and prefer the overall editor to an alternative. The help page supports trying some AI features, but it does not conclusively establish the final export resolution, absence of watermarks, media licensing or all model allowances at the time of research.

A buyer should run one very short approved test and inspect the account's usage panel, export screen and license terms before treating Free as a production plan. A free editor with credit-free manual actions is not necessarily a subscription that grants every delivery option. We would not budget paid client work around an unspecified free allowance. The source supports a free tier, not a guaranteed free trial of all paid functionality. In the uploaded Tool record, hasFreePlan is true while hasFreeTrial is false, and no conflicting official free-trial promise was established.

Starter: 400 credits and the full manual timeline

Starter is currently shown at $20 per seat with monthly billing, or an advertised $10 per month equivalent billed annually. The annual commitment is $120 per seat under the displayed offer. It includes 400 monthly AI credits per seat, the full browser timeline, Agent Two Lite, access to selected models, up to five editor seats and 200 GB of storage. The plan also lists 100 premium stock footage items. What it does not include is the same high-end generation-model access promoted on Plus and Max.

Starter is a logical test purchase for one producer who edits human-shot clips and generates occasional supporting visuals. Its low advertised annual entry price is less useful if the required output depends on a model excluded from the tier. Before selecting Starter, use the official comparison grid to identify the exact resolution, AI agent mode and generation family your production needs. If the brief requires the gated model, upgrading later could be more efficient than wasting time trying to work around limitations.

Plus: larger credit pool and expanded models

Plus displays $60 per editor seat on monthly billing or $30 equivalent on annual billing during the current promotional offer. That means $360 paid up front per annual seat. Its 2,000 monthly credits per seat are five times the Starter allowance at three times the discounted annual-equivalent seat cost. Plus also opens additional frontier agent modes and, according to the live price matrix, Seedance model options not available on Starter. The displayed plan includes 600 GB of storage and up to ten editor seats.

This may be a better fit for an agency producing several paid social concepts each week. However, credits are a production resource rather than a guaranteed number of approved finished videos. A complex AI clip may require multiple attempts. The page references guest-seat allowances; buyers should verify the guest role, permissions and separate credit arrangements, especially if clients need only to review work. Plus provides more capacity, not a promise of better editorial judgment or a fixed cost per successful output.

Max: high generation volume and storage

Max displays $150 per editor seat monthly, or $75 monthly equivalent when billed annually during the listed offer. One annual seat at the displayed rate costs $900 up front. The base allowance is 5,000 credits per seat each month, with a larger 2,000 GB storage allocation and up to twenty editor seats on the current price card. The vendor also promotes better generation-credit economics on this tier. Additional Max generation-volume selections may appear in the interactive pricing calculator; buyers should quote the exact capacity selected rather than assume every Max configuration costs $75.

Max makes the most sense when there is an approved, repetitive high-volume workflow. An agency with many clients can use more credits, but that alone does not justify a bigger subscription unless its teams finish and publish the generated work. Start with real production logs: number of projects, first-pass drafts, revisions, approval rate and credits used. Also clarify whether large raw-footage archives need storage outside the platform and how staff permissions work across client projects. The highest tier is not necessarily the best value for a low-volume editor.

Enterprise: negotiated capacity and governance

InVideo markets business security and governance capabilities including single sign-on and SOC 2-related claims. Those are reasons to request its enterprise materials, not evidence that every commercial term or implementation detail applies automatically. The public page does not provide a fixed enterprise dollar rate. An appropriate request for proposal should list editor and guest counts, monthly and burst-generation needs, model access, region, support response expectations, intellectual-property terms, privacy requirements and onboarding obligations.

For a regulated or large marketing organization, the true purchase decision may turn on identity management, approval records, data retention and contract protections more than the difference in AI-credit unit price. Ask sales for the current controls report and DPA, then evaluate whether subcontractor models receive uploaded media. A vendor's marketing security badge is not an audited review by Toollers. We did not receive a private enterprise quotation or complete a security assessment.

Worked cost scenarios

One creator choosing Starter annually

Assume one person needs to edit social clips and the required models are permitted on Starter. At the currently advertised annual rate, the calculation is one seat multiplied by $10 per month equivalent multiplied by twelve months: $120 paid up front. Paying the displayed standard monthly rate over twelve uninterrupted months would be $20 times twelve, or $240, assuming no price change. The difference is $120 before taxes or add-on credit purchases. The lower total comes with a full-year commitment rather than twelve independent monthly payments.

The buyer should check whether the 400-credit monthly pool fits their particular media. If they mainly trim footage manually, credits may remain unused. If they repeatedly ask agents to regenerate scenes, the pool can disappear much sooner. Because included credits do not roll over, unused allowance has no cash or future-month value. The better option may therefore depend on whether the creator's schedule is regular or seasonal.

Three-person team using Plus

Assume three active editors need Plus features and each holds a paid seat. The displayed annual price is three multiplied by $360 per seat, or $1,080 up front for the year, excluding taxes and purchased extras. The listed allowance is 2,000 credits per seat per month, or 6,000 across the three seats if the plan counts every seat as described. A corresponding monthly-billing base would be three multiplied by $60, or $180 per month. Twelve months at an unchanged monthly rate would total $2,160.

This scenario does not include guest seats, because a guest allowance is not necessarily a substitute for a full active editor. The team should confirm whether credits are allocated or pooled at workspace level in its exact order, whether unfinished projects are accessible to guests and whether different roles can initiate billable AI requests. If one staff member uses most credits, the internal allocation policy may matter. The advertised price is only the base subscription, not a fixed production budget.

Two-seat Max production unit

For two Max editor seats at the displayed $75 annual monthly equivalent, the calculation is two multiplied by $75 multiplied by twelve, or $1,800 billed up front. At $150 on monthly billing, the two-seat base would be $300 per month and $3,600 over twelve unchanged months. The displayed default 5,000 credits per seat creates a nominal 10,000-credit monthly allowance for those two seats, subject to actual plan/workspace rules. Max's interactive calculator also permits larger generation allocations, so confirm that the $75 rate corresponds to the selected baseline rather than a larger configuration.

A useful internal budget might track AI credits separately from staff time and media licensing. If an expensive model repeatedly fails to follow the brief, a higher subscription may increase experimentation but not improve unit economics. Keep the production acceptance rate visible. The best scenario is one in which a team knows when to regenerate, when to correct manually and when to use real footage or stock instead of synthetic motion.

How InVideo AI credits are charged

According to InVideo's official help center, AI agent actions and generated images, video, sound or other media consume credits. A model's published price may be expressed per second or per generated item; duration, resolution, audio and model family affect the debit. That means the 400 credits on Starter do not always buy the same amount of finished footage as another user's 400 credits. The vendor's current pricing comparison gives examples of model-specific output counts, but those estimates assume a particular model and settings and should not be generalized.

Manual timeline editing—including rearranging, splitting and trimming clips—does not deduct credits. Exporting and downloading also do not consume AI credits, though plan-level rights and formats may still apply. This makes it sensible to separate two line items on an agency's production sheet: labor and generation. A producer can conserve the credit pool by doing routine edits directly on the timeline and use agents selectively for tasks where their automation adds value. The platform's help articles describe checking the credit cost of individual agent exchanges and project usage totals.

For forecasting, list the intended model, seconds per clip, number of variants and revision allowance. Estimate credits as the provider's current per-second cost multiplied by seconds and attempts, then add agent-processing and other media costs disclosed in the workspace. For example, if a model quotes 30 credits for one short clip, five accepted clips would consume 150 credits only if each is produced successfully in one charged generation; a second attempt for all five would double that portion. This is illustrative arithmetic, not a promise that every model costs 30 credits per clip.

Unused credits, top-ups and upgrades

Paid monthly allotments reset and unused credits do not roll into the next month. Separate add-on credits can remain valid for up to twelve months after purchase or until the paid subscription ends, whichever happens first. This distinction matters for seasonal campaigns: a brand might run twelve video launches in November and only one in January, but unused January plan credits cannot be saved for the next large burst. Planning around a busy month and a realistic generation buffer is more useful than multiplying an average video count by a universal credit price.

InVideo permits extra-credit purchases and plan upgrades according to its help information. The vendor describes prorated upgrades, but we did not verify current top-up unit prices for every account and currency. Do not embed a made-up dollar-per-credit charge or unlimited top-up promise in a purchase order. Ask what happens after the credit pool is exhausted, whether an admin must approve more credits and whether renewal or cancellation affects purchased extras. A policy that blocks unapproved credit purchases can prevent unexpected spend in a collaborative workspace.

Seats, guests, storage and export costs

The public plan matrix lists up to five editors on Starter, ten on Plus and twenty on Max, with different guest arrangements. Teams should distinguish a paid editor, an external reviewer and a person who only downloads final deliverables. Five people with occasional review access do not necessarily require five editor subscriptions; equally, a guest account may not be permitted to perform the production work expected from a paid seat. Confirm role entitlements before calculating an agency license count.

Discounts, taxes, renewal and cancellation

The official pricing page currently advertises a 50% saving on annual billing. We have labeled that as a current promotional rate, not a permanent list price. Users should compare the final checkout screen with the pricing grid, paying attention to the country, sales tax or VAT treatment, chosen number of seats and any add-on credits. The prices in this guide are USD as displayed; we did not convert them to INR or another currency because that would require a dated exchange rate and may not match the vendor's local checkout.

InVideo's August 2026 terms state that paid subscriptions are billed in advance and renew automatically unless canceled under the available process. The general refund policy is non-refundable, with an exception allowing a request within seven days of an initial purchase or renewal if no credits or premium features were used, subject to applicable local law. It also says it does not offer a prorated refund for unused subscription time. This is particularly important on annual billing: a monthly equivalent should not be mistaken for permission to stop payments after one month.

Buyers should read the current Terms and support refund article immediately before payment. A request is not the same as an automatic guarantee of money back; a paid generation or premium feature use may remove eligibility. App-store billing can have a different contracting and refund route. Keep the initial invoice, confirmation email, plan name, exact promotion, credit balance and cancellation acknowledgment for a clear audit trail. InVideo can change prices for a later renewal with notice under the terms, so check the renewal rate separately from today's offer.

Which plan is the best value?

Starter is attractive when the person spends more time manually editing than requesting new AI media. Plus is the likely comparison point when higher models or more frequent generation are necessary. Max makes sense only when credit consumption and model availability justify it; the plan should not be chosen solely because it offers a lower advertised unit cost for generation. A sales-led arrangement is more appropriate when identity, procurement, governance or contractual support requirements drive the purchase.

A small team might find a text-to-video narration tool more predictable if its workflow is mostly converting scripts into visual scenes. An editorial organization may value Pictory's article-to-video workflow; a subtitling operation may prefer VEED's focused editing and caption tools; a creative studio may prefer Runway for advanced generation. Their prices and usage units are different, so we do not present an unsourced one-number winner. The practical comparison is total cost per approved project, including revisions and human finishing.

Our price-check method and recommendation

To choose well, prepare three sample briefs representing a normal, a complex and a rushed project. Record what media can come from existing footage and what absolutely needs AI generation. Estimate the required model costs using the current calculator, then add a realistic allowance for rejected outputs. Choose the least expensive tier that exposes the required models and supports the people who must edit the work. Keep annual and month-to-month calculations separate; do not assume the advertised discount is always available or that all changes will be free of AI charges.

We would initially favor a monthly pilot when generation volume is unknown, even though the advertised per-seat rate is higher, because one or two representative projects can reveal costs that the first price card does not. Once the team knows its monthly accepted output and credit burn, the annual offer is easier to evaluate. If generation is a minor part of a footage-led process, the full manual timeline may make Starter enough. If advanced models are central, compare Plus and Max based on real credit use and capabilities rather than on an arbitrary title.

Frequently asked questions about InVideo pricing

Sources and editorial disclosures

Related InVideo articles

Review · Alternatives