PromeAI Pricing: Free, Base, Standard, Pro and Ultimate

PromeAI has a free personal-use entry and four named paid levels: Base, Standard, Pro and Ultimate. The current official membership page publishes coin limits and major entitlements, but displays paid web price cells as dashes. Its US iPad App Store listing separately shows $29, $39, $79 and $119 monthly in-app purchase amounts for those four plans. This PromeAI pricing guide keeps those two purchase channels separate and explains why commercial rights, model settings and actual usable output can matter more than a headline subscription amount.

PromeAI pricing table: website entitlements versus iPad prices

The price column is explicitly from the US Apple App Store listing for the PromeAI iPad application, as observed on November 5, 2026. The vendor’s website displays $-- for Base, Standard, Pro and Ultimate in the readable current membership view, so we cannot independently claim the same amounts apply to direct browser subscriptions. Taxes, region, checkout location, discounts and Apple billing conditions can also change the final charge.

The coin and commercial-license columns come from PromeAI’s official membership comparison. They are stronger purchasing evidence than an old pricing screenshot, because they correspond to the current plans. A buyer should still verify the final prepayment summary, included generation models, renewal timing, commercial usage terms and any special offer. The free level is an access option, not a reliable cost forecast for a production workflow.

PromeAI Free: an evaluation environment, not a commercial license

The free entry is best used to learn PromeAI’s interface, test sketch input and find where a workflow demands a paid model or export. Try one rough house elevation, one room photograph, one product line drawing and a short text prompt. Save a record of what generates, what waits in a queue and which exports remain available. The current paid membership grid does not publish a stable free coin entitlement in the same form as its paid rows.

The commercial-use distinction is important. PromeAI’s own licensing guide describes both Free and Base as personal, noncommercial tiers. A concept generated under a free account should not automatically be inserted into an agency client deck, an ecommerce advertisement or a paid deliverable. Ask whether the license permits the specific planned use before relying on an output, even if the artwork itself looks production-ready.

For students or hobbyists, the free workflow can be enough to compare prompt responsiveness and style choices. For a business, the trial should instead be treated as technical discovery. The decision to buy needs a paid plan with appropriate rights and a realistic estimate of model consumption. An accessible interface does not answer those procurement questions on its own.

Base plan: 500 coins and personal-use restrictions

The official Base tier currently lists 500 monthly generation coins, two simultaneous image generations, 50 Fast Mode generations per month and space for up to ten pending image jobs. It also lists purchasing extra coins at $10 for 200 coins in the stated package. These are plan descriptions, not a guarantee that 500 coins produce 500 approved project images. Different models and quality settings consume different amounts.

Base can fit a personal designer exploring concepts for a home renovation, illustration class or portfolio practice that does not involve commercial output. A user might compare several facade styles, visualize furniture choices or try an occasional background change. If the plan is purchased through the US iPad App Store, its listed in-app monthly amount is $29. That listing does not resolve the missing direct web checkout figure.

The strongest reason not to select Base for a creative agency is licensing, not raw volume. PromeAI explicitly labels the tier personal-only. A designer preparing paid real-estate marketing materials or selling a client concept cannot assume Base grants the rights needed. When commercial delivery is the intended result, compare Standard or a higher eligible tier before paying.

Standard plan: commercial use and 2,000 monthly coins

Standard is the first currently listed paid plan with an explicit commercial license. It carries 2,000 coins per month, up to five concurrent image generations, 100 monthly Fast Mode generations and a twenty-job pending image queue. The published extra-coin offer is $10 for 250 coins, a better coin count than the Base package. The US iPad App Store lists a $39 monthly Standard purchase, which remains separate from direct website billing.

This tier is a logical starting point for freelance interior designers, small architecture studios and marketing teams producing a limited number of client-approved images. The primary purchasing calculation is how often an idea needs regeneration. A concept that looks useful on the first attempt might be inexpensive, whereas a style-sensitive project could require several revisions for materials, camera perspective and exact object placement.

Commercial permission is not an intellectual-property warranty. Outputs may still resemble existing brands or architectural works, and people, reference photographs and uploaded plans require proper authorization. Standard can make the subscription legally suitable for eligible client delivery under the vendor plan, while the buyer remains responsible for the rights and accuracy of inputs and final imagery.

Pro plan: 6,000 coins plus one unlimited direction

Pro includes 6,000 monthly coins, a commercial license and ten concurrent image streams in the current membership description. It adds up to 200 Fast Mode generations a month and a pending queue of up to forty generation jobs. The user chooses one unlimited benefit: eligible image generation or eligible video generation. This choice is the defining distinction from Ultimate and should be made based on the actual production mix.

An architecture firm producing dozens of still concepts may prefer the image direction, while a motion-focused studio might select video. Choosing images does not grant free use of every video model, and the reverse also applies. PromeAI says unsupported models, special settings and some configurations continue to spend coins. Its GPT-image exceptions are unlimited only at specified 1K low-quality settings; other configurations use discounted coin pricing.

The US iPad store lists Pro Monthly for $79, but the live web plan does not disclose a verified numeric amount. A purchasing manager should record which unlimited direction was selected, the eligible model list and whether switching the benefit is possible under the selected subscription. Without those details, an advertised unlimited package can be misread as eliminating all generation costs.

Ultimate plan: eligible images and videos simultaneously

Ultimate also includes 6,000 monthly coins according to the current vendor comparison. Its difference from Pro is simultaneous access to eligible unlimited image and video models. That is more attractive to teams creating a sequence of still concepts, animated pitch material and marketing clips in the same month. The US iPad App Store lists Ultimate Monthly at $119, while the accessible web membership cell remains blank.

The word eligible matters. PromeAI’s model table and FAQ say some image configurations, GPT variants, video modes and durations remain metered. The 6,000 monthly coins are useful for those paid models and settings even under Ultimate. Unlimited eligible generations do not deduct from that allowance when the matching benefit is active, but paid generation outside the offer does.

Ultimate may simplify a mixed-production workflow, but it will not fix inaccurate source sketches or guarantee a photorealistic room. Agencies still need image inspection, defined approval checkpoints and a generation log. The decision to move from Pro should be driven by the amount of eligible activity in both images and videos, not merely the presence of a larger plan name.

How PromeAI coins and model costs work

PromeAI’s current membership table estimates the maximum number of operations from the monthly coin balance for each model. Those figures assume every coin is spent on the same model at its lowest verified settings, and the official page warns that the counts cannot be added across models. For example, it lists different theoretical image counts for Qwen, Nano Banana and GPT-image variants, along with separate video estimates based on five-second standard-speed tasks.

Suppose a Standard account uses a portion of its 2,000 coins to generate room interiors and another portion for short motion previews. The total output is the sum of actual coin debits, not the sum of the optimistic maximums printed next to each individual model. Higher resolution, optional audio, extra references, different duration and re-runs can change the effective cost per approved result.

The practical metric for a buyer is the cost per accepted visual. Record the first prompt, model, quality, cost, number of retries and result status. If ten generated concepts produce two client-approved designs, then their production cost is divided by two, not by ten. This protects project budgets from the common mistake of equating a generation with a usable deliverable.

What the unlimited label includes and excludes

For Pro, the unlimited promise applies to only the selected direction and only the eligible model and settings combinations. Ultimate grants eligible image and video directions together. The vendor’s current FAQ explicitly states that coins remain necessary for models and features outside the selected unlimited coverage. Video eligibility is affected by model, duration and mode; some GPT image configurations are metered even when unlimited images are active.

An image-first team should choose a target model and a typical resolution, then check the live eligibility table. A motion team should check standard speed, seconds, reference-image rules and any audio settings before assuming a clip costs no coins. For a complex project, it is possible for unlimited concept images to coexist with paid premium upscales or metered video experiments.

Speed and concurrency also matter. A plan can allow unlimited eligible generation while maintaining simultaneous job caps and fair usage. If multiple designers share a workflow, scheduling and queue limits affect delivery time. The current membership page gives concurrency figures, but does not support an unrestricted promise that every request will start instantly regardless of load.

Monthly Fast Mode quotas, queues and top-up coins

Base lists 50 monthly Fast Mode generations, Standard 100 and Pro 200, with standard coin pricing after the respective allowance. Its published concurrent image limits are two, five and ten. The current page also identifies pending queue limits of ten, twenty and forty jobs for those plans. Ultimate offers broad eligible unlimited coverage, but buyers should inspect its active speed and fair-concurrency conditions at checkout.

Top-up pricing differs by tier in the present vendor table. It states $10 buys 200 coins at Base, 250 at Standard and 400 at Pro, subject to the stated discounts. These package ratios are useful for estimating occasional paid-model use, but they do not establish how much a particular 3D sketch, upscaled render or video costs. That still depends on the selected generation configuration.

A studio should keep a monthly ledger with opening balance, generation spending, any top-ups, rejected jobs and remaining coins. If unused monthly coins expire or are reset, the impact should be checked against account terms because the accessible public comparison does not verify a universal rollover rule. Avoid buying a large top-up until the actual model and delivery pace have been tested.

Monthly versus annual billing

The official website provides Monthly and Yearly selectors and promotes an annual discount, but the readable current price cells are missing exact numeric web charges. The US iPad App Store separately publishes some annual products, including Base Yearly $294.99, Standard Yearly $349 and Pro Yearly $709. Those are Apple in-app purchase listings, not authenticated rates for all countries or browser customers.

Monthly billing makes it easier to evaluate a new AI design service without committing a full year. Annual billing can reduce a stable recurring cost, but only if the chosen production flow and commercial license will be used consistently. The right denominator is usable assets over the contract period. If a design firm uses the app intensively for only two months a year, a lower annual equivalent may still be worse value.

Check the renewal control in the channel where the subscription was purchased. Apple purchases are managed under Apple subscription controls; direct PromeAI web purchases depend on the active vendor checkout terms. Keep a dated copy of plan benefits, purchase confirmation and cancellation policy rather than assuming both channels operate identically.

Commercial licensing for architecture, marketing and client visuals

The vendor’s commercial-use guidance and live membership comparison make a clear tier boundary: Free and Base do not grant the commercial rights that Standard, Pro and Ultimate state. A freelance architect producing paid concept presentations or a brand agency delivering customer campaign assets should therefore begin its pricing comparison at Standard. The project’s payment status and use of the output matter more than whether a picture is only a draft.

Commercial rights do not excuse misuse of somebody else’s reference photo, logo, patent drawing or personal image. Uploaded floor plans can also be confidential. A design team should obtain authority to use its inputs, confirm the vendor’s current retention and privacy rules and avoid suggesting that a speculative AI render is a construction-accurate plan. Public promotional visuals and architectural documentation serve different purposes.

For each client, record which account and tier produced the final asset, the relevant license terms and any applicable restrictions. This is particularly useful when a project is handed off months later and a new team asks if generated illustrations can be reused in an advertisement. Clear documentation is cheaper than discovering the licensing question after publication.

Sample budgets for solo creators and studios

Consider a student who only needs a dozen personal sketches for exploration. A limited free account or Base might meet the use case, provided the account allows the required model and exports. The student’s actual cost depends on checkout channel and spent coins. That calculation changes immediately if the same pictures are to be sold to a local client, because the intended use would require an eligible commercial license.

Now consider an interior designer who presents three room directions and two revisions for each room. If the project covers eight spaces, that is already at least seventy-two concept images before rejected attempts. Standard’s 2,000-coin pool may be enough for one mix of models but insufficient for another. The published per-model estimates cannot answer this until the designer records actual debit and acceptance rates.

Finally, consider a studio creating still sketches and five-second promotional videos weekly. If the selected Pro unlimited direction covers its main output category, Pro may be efficient; if both directions are heavily used and eligible, Ultimate becomes relevant. If the studio uses premium excluded models almost exclusively, both plans may require substantial coins. The right purchase follows the workflow.

PromeAI versus competing creative subscriptions

PromeAI is oriented toward sketch-to-render visualization and creative model workflows. Krea AI is a close comparison for real-time generative images and model experimentation, while Ideogram places more emphasis on graphic imagery with text. Canva is usually a stronger comparison for fully editable branded layouts rather than architectural concept rendering.

For ecommerce, Photoroom and InsMind emphasize product cutouts, catalog scenes and repeatable listing work. Those services may offer faster production for standardized retail visuals than a sketch-oriented creative workspace. Comparing subscription prices without considering primary output type can lead a business to pay for the wrong category of feature.

Use a consistent purchase test across providers: take the same source sketch or photograph, generate a fixed number of candidates, edit two, then export at the required resolution. Compare paid amounts, quota use, consent and rights, and time spent. Those measurements matter more than comparing the word unlimited across products with different models and export rules.

Who should choose which PromeAI tier?

The first commercial tier is Standard

If a project will be sold, licensed to a client or used in a paid marketing campaign, the vendor’s current plan table makes Standard the logical entry point because Free and Base are noncommercial. Confirm that the intended source material and final use are covered by applicable terms; commercial membership does not transfer someone else’s intellectual property.

Final PromeAI pricing recommendation

For personal experiments, start free and assess whether Base’s coin allowance solves the bottleneck. For genuine client work, Standard is the first official commercial tier and should be the baseline. Pro makes sense when either eligible images or eligible videos dominates production; Ultimate deserves consideration when both categories are regular outputs. In every case the current web checkout must be consulted because its public plan cells do not show verified numeric amounts.

Keep your paid subscription separate from production quality. The vendor describes the capabilities and the entitlement model, but that does not prove a specific sketch will match a client’s intended geometry or palette. Run an approval set before committing to annual billing and review data policies when using unreleased client material.

PromeAI pricing FAQs

Continue reading about PromeAI

• PromeAI Review: Sketch Rendering, Design and Video Tools
• 7 Best PromeAI Alternatives for AI Design and Images