Syncro Pricing: Core vs Team Plans & Costs

Syncro pricing is relatively transparent in a category where many remote monitoring and management (RMM) vendors prefer private quotes. Its current public page advertises two main plans: Core and Team. Both combine RMM and professional services automation (PSA) with a fee based on the number of subscribed users rather than the number of eligible Windows and Mac endpoint agents. The simple headline is appealing for an MSP whose device estate grows faster than its technician headcount, but it is only part of the cost. Security modules, backup, payment processing, onboarding, term commitments and service workflows can change the real total. In this guide, I break down Syncro's official prices and the questions buyers should verify before paying. I have not bought a license or reviewed a private invoice.

Syncro pricing plans at a glance

These are published per-user monthly amounts, not a guarantee of the final amount on every invoice. The standard annual-rate option has been marketed as a discounted commitment, while the vendor announced additional payment arrangements in July 2026. A business must check the selected term, billing frequency, tax, user count and cancellation terms. The pricing page emphasizes no-contract monthly choices, but the newer fixed-term offers have a commitment that should not be described as freely cancellable month to month. Ask for written confirmation of the exact plan shown at checkout.

Core plan: $129 annually rated or $139 monthly

Core is the entry paid plan and contains the combination that makes Syncro distinctive: RMM, PSA, ticketing, estimates, invoices, payments, recurring billing, policy automation, scripting, Splashtop and a customer portal. Syncro also lists common integrations and support resources. For a small MSP, these features may reduce the need to pay for a separate basic help desk and remote-access stack. Yet whether a switch saves money depends on the existing tools and the effort required to move contracts and customer records. I would not assume all current PSA custom fields can be imported or recreated automatically.

What Core does not include

The public matrix differentiates Core from Team on network discovery, more sophisticated ticket routing and assignments, guided ticket resolution, scheduled database exports, Entra ID identity actions, Microsoft 365 security baselines and assessments, and selected remote-session features. If one of those capabilities is mandatory, Core's lower price may be irrelevant. During the free trial, which includes Team, I would explicitly record which features the technicians used and mark whether they remain when choosing Core. It is easy to judge a trial favorably and later discover that the purchased entry tier lacks a function that made the test convenient.

Team plan: $179 annually rated or $189 monthly

Team adds capabilities intended for larger or more complex MSP and IT operations. The official comparison identifies network discovery, advanced ticket automation and assignment, guided ticket resolution, database exports and Microsoft 365 features such as Entra ID sync and actions, automated license billing, tenant security baselines and security assessments. Its remote support options also include additional collaboration and recording features compared with Core. Those additions can be valuable, but only if they solve problems that staff have measured. Paying more for unused identity tooling or dashboards does not improve service margins.

A practical Team business case

Suppose technicians currently spend two hours each week manually routing and recategorizing tickets. Team's advanced automations might help, but the savings must be demonstrated in a pilot. Similarly, an MSP handling many Microsoft 365 tenants could benefit from coordinated user provisioning and baseline visibility; an MSP without responsibility for tenant administration may not. I would measure the actual task time in Core-equivalent workflows and Team features, then compare the difference with the per-user premium. Identity actions should remain subject to least-privilege roles and client approvals even if they become easier to execute.

Annual versus monthly payment: the hidden distinction

Syncro's public price table provides annual and monthly rate columns. In July 2026, the company announced an option to obtain the annual discount through a yearlong subscription that is paid monthly rather than entirely up front. It also mentioned discounts for 24- and 36-month agreements. The announcement matters because an annual-rate payment made every month is not necessarily a true month-to-month subscription. A purchaser should ask about the binding term, renewal procedure, early termination, plan upgrades, seat reductions and whether a promotional discount persists after renewal.

I would compare cash flow as well as total cost. Annual prepayment can require a larger initial outlay; monthly installments under a fixed term may preserve cash but still obligate the business for the term. A freely cancellable monthly plan offers more flexibility at a higher public rate. If you are a new MSP with uncertain staffing, flexibility may be worth the premium. A stable provider with predictable seat counts can compare the rate discount with the risk of paying for unused seats. Read the order form before treating a marketing phrase such as "no contracts" as a universal legal statement.

Pricing examples for three- and five-person teams

At the public annual Core rate, three users cost $387 per month in subscription-equivalent terms, or $4,644 across 12 months before any add-ons or taxes. Three Team users would be $537 per month, or $6,444 annually. With five users, the same Core calculation is $645 per month or $7,740 annually; Team is $895 per month or $10,740 annually. These are straightforward arithmetic examples based on the published rates, not customer invoices. They assume a constant user count and no extra services.

On the standard monthly rates, three Core users equal $417 per month and three Team users $567. Five Core users equal $695 per month; five Team users equal $945. The spread makes the term decision visible. However, adding or removing users during an actual subscription can trigger prorating or other contractual rules, and the availability of monthly paid annual commitments must be verified. I would model expected staffing changes month by month rather than simply multiplying the first month's seat count by 12 when the business is expanding rapidly.

Why unlimited endpoints does not mean unlimited spend

Syncro's Core and Team plans emphasize unlimited eligible Windows and Mac RMM agents per subscribed user. That means the base price need not rise each time another supported endpoint is added, provided the required license and plan conditions are met. It can make RMM budgeting easier than a device-metered subscription. But the vendor's comparison page explicitly lists some security, backup and email protection integrations as separately priced. A managed fleet with more devices may therefore increase external or optional software spending even when the base Syncro license remains unchanged.

I would build two lists: what Core or Team already provides, and what you must buy elsewhere to deliver the client's service agreement. For example, backup storage, endpoint antivirus, EDR, email filtering and some network monitoring may have their own units. If an integration replaces an existing tool, count the verified canceled license after migration, not immediately. If it creates a new security service, count labor for deployment and response. A platform can be inexpensive per technician while still supporting a substantial per-device security stack. Those expenses should remain visible to finance and to client account managers.

Add-ons and external fees

The public matrix names Acronis, Bitdefender, Emsisoft, Proofpoint and Webroot among available add-ons and warns that separate pricing may apply. The platform also lists payment connections such as Stripe and Worldpay and accounting integrations such as QuickBooks and Xero. Payment processors may charge transaction fees even when access to a payment integration is in the Syncro plan. A complete MSP margin model should include those fees on invoices collected through the platform.

Some Team capabilities may remove the need for separately purchased Microsoft 365 management or network discovery products, but only if they satisfy your specific requirements. For remote access, clarify session recording, simultaneous technician connections, file transfer and retention. For reporting, check whether scheduled exports are included in the plan you select. The best value comes from software you can actually retire, not from a long catalog of capabilities that remain unused.

The 14-day Syncro free trial

Syncro advertises a no-credit-card trial lasting 14 days and states that it includes Team features. Users may then continue with Team or select Core. The vendor describes the trial as providing broad platform access and says configurations can continue after a subscription is activated. I would still confirm trial provisioning and any current regional conditions at signup. The trial is valuable for exploring integrated workflows, but two weeks can be short for a typical monthly invoicing cycle. Prepare test customers, demo invoices and service scenarios before activating access so the billing side receives as much scrutiny as the endpoint console.

A focused trial checklist

Create one test customer with a fixed recurring agreement and one with billable time. Add representative Windows and Mac devices, set safe monitoring rules and run a basic script. Test any required QuickBooks, Xero or payment integration with nonproduction data. Next, review Team network discovery and Microsoft 365 functions only if those are real requirements. Finally, downgrade the feature checklist to Core and see what would be lost. The goal is a purchasing decision, not an impressive number of installed agents.

Compare Syncro with Atera, NinjaOne and other RMMs

Atera is another vendor with per-technician pricing and unlimited managed endpoints under applicable plans. NinjaOne describes tiered per-endpoint pricing with volume effects. N-able N-sight and Datto RMM require tailored quotes. The cost curves differ: Syncro's base fee responds to user count, while an endpoint-based offer responds more directly to fleet size. A five-technician MSP managing 200 devices may reach a different conclusion than the same team managing 2,000 devices. I would obtain matched annual quotes with the same patching, remote support, security and PSA requirements before announcing a winner.

The comparison should include operating-system support. Syncro's pricing page explicitly names Windows and Mac unlimited RMM agents and Windows Patch Management, while its roadmap discusses Linux development. If Linux management is essential, a competitor may offer a more appropriate current production feature set. If your MSP depends on ticketing and invoicing, an endpoint-only RMM may require a separately licensed PSA. The purchase price should reflect everything needed to serve clients, not just the monitoring software.

Is Syncro Core or Team worth the cost?

I would choose Core first when straightforward RMM, tickets, invoices and remote support cover the full use case. Team deserves consideration when advanced ticket routing, identity operations, network discovery or security baselines will demonstrably reduce manual work or replace other products. The added per-user cost is visible from the pricing table, so quantify the return conservatively. Ask operations staff to estimate recurring labor savings only after running real tasks in a trial. If an automation saves a few clicks but requires ongoing maintenance, its net value may be less than a demonstration suggests.

For internal IT departments, the PSA billing components may be less valuable because employees are not invoiced as customers. In that case, compare Syncro with dedicated RMM or UEM products that prioritize configuration, OS deployment and endpoint security. For MSPs already tied to a mature PSA, migration costs can dominate the first year's budget. A platform should not be chosen merely because it provides more features; choose it because the required end-to-end workflow becomes safer, simpler or cheaper.

Who should use each plan?

Who may need another option?

Final verdict on Syncro pricing

Syncro's transparent per-user Core and Team rates offer a refreshingly clear starting point for MSP budgeting. They are not a complete cost-of-ownership figure, however. I would select the cheapest plan that supports the necessary PSA, remote support, automation and Microsoft 365 workflows, then add security services and operational costs. A 14-day Team trial can clarify whether Team's premium is justified. Verify payment frequency separately from contractual commitment, and model what happens if the technician team changes size. With those checks, Syncro can be compared fairly against quote-based RMMs and other per-technician alternatives.

Related Toollers research and sources

See the Syncro tool profile.

Continue reading about Syncro

• Syncro Review: RMM, PSA and Key Tradeoffs
• 6 Best Syncro Alternatives for MSPs and IT Teams